Mercurial > hg > octave-nkf
diff doc/interpreter/dynamic.txi @ 6939:46d1ad37d943
[project @ 2007-10-01 16:12:20 by jwe]
author | jwe |
---|---|
date | Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:12:20 +0000 |
parents | 2aad75fcc93a |
children | 8b0cfeb06365 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/doc/interpreter/dynamic.txi +++ b/doc/interpreter/dynamic.txi @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ @itemize @bullet @item -Can I get the same functionality using the Octave scripting language only. +Can I get the same functionality using the Octave scripting language only? @item Is it thoroughly optimized Octave code? Vectorization of Octave code, doesn't just make it concise, it generally significantly improves its @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ The basic functions to access the data contained in an array is @code{mxGetPr}. As the mex interface assumes that the real and imaginary -parts of a complex array are stored seperately, there is an equivalent +parts of a complex array are stored separately, there is an equivalent function @code{mxGetPi} that get the imaginary part. Both of these functions are for use only with double precision matrices. There also exists the generic function @code{mxGetData} and @code{mxGetImagData} @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ The Octave format for sparse matrices is identical to the mex format in that it is a compressed colument sparse format. Also in both, sparse matrices are required to be two dimensional. The only difference is that -the real and imaginary parts of the matrix are stored seperately. +the real and imaginary parts of the matrix are stored separately. The mex-file interface, as well as using @code{mxGetM}, @code{mxGetN}, @code{mxSetM}, @code{mxSetN}, @code{mxGetPr}, @code{mxGetPi},